Main Article Content

Abstract

In intensive salmon farming, it is common practice to spread the feed over a large surface area, assuming that spreading of the feed increases feed intake in the fish. However, the impact on the feed pellets during spreading results in feed loss due to pellet breakage. In this study, feed intake, growth and signs of aggressive behavior was compared in salmon fed without or with spreading of the feed on the surface area of the tanks. Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) with initial body weight 0.6 kg were kept in 3.3 m 3 tanks supplied with sea water (salinity 32 %, mean temperature 11 °C) for one month. The salmon were fed one meal daily, either by dropping the feed from one point, or by spreading the feed over the water surface. Feed intake and growth was measured. Fin damage was given a score at termination of the trial as a measure of competitive behavior during feeding. The relative feed intake (i.e. percent of body weight per day) in salmon fed without spreading or with spreading of the feed was 0.63±0.05 and 0.64±0.02 %, respectively. The growth rate was identical in salmon fed without or with spreading of the feed, and no significant difference in variance in final weight was found. No difference in fin damage for salmon fed without or with spreading of the feed was revealed. The data showed that for the conditions used in this trial, spreading of feed had no influence on feed intake or growth of salmon.

Keywords

Atlantic salmon Spreading of feed Feed intake Feeding behavior.

Article Details

Author Biographies

Turid Synnøve Aas, Nofima

PhD, Scientist

Department: Nutrition and Feed Technology

Trine Ytrestøyl, Nofima

PhD, Senior Scientist

Department: Nutrition and Feed Technology

Torbjørn Åsgård, Nofima

PhD, Adviser

Department: Nutrition and Feed Technology

Kristoffer Rist Skøien, NTNU

PhD

Department of Engineering Cybernetics

Morten Omholt Alver, NTNU SINTEF Ocean

NTNU Department of Engineering Cybernetics

 

Jo Arve Alfredsen, NTNU

NTNU Department of Engineering Cybernetics
How to Cite
Aas, T. S., Ytrestøyl, T., Åsgård, T., Skøien, K. R., Alver, M. O., & Alfredsen, J. A. (2020). Feed intake in Atlantic salmon fed with or without surface spreading of feed. Journal of Agricultural and Marine Sciences [JAMS], 25, 20–26. Retrieved from https://journals.squ.edu.om/index.php/jams/article/view/3162

References

  1. Aas TS, Oehme M, He G, Sørensen M, Lygren I, Åsgård T. 2011a. Analysis of pellet degradation of extruded high energy fish feeds with different physical qualities in a pneumatic feeding system. Aquacultural Engineering. 44(1): 25-34.
  2. Aas TS, Sixten HJ, Hillestad M, Sveier H, Ytrestøyl T, Hatlen B, Åsgård T. 2017. Measurement of gastrointestinal passage rate in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed dry or soaked feed. Aquaculture Reports. 8: 49-57.
  3. Aas TS, Terjesen BF, Sigholt T, Hillestad M, Holm J, Refstie S, Baeverfjord G, Rørvik K-A, Sørensen M, Oehme M et al. . 2011b. Nutritional responses in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed diets with different physical qualities at stable or variable environmental conditions. Aquaculture Nutrition. 17: 657-670.
  4. Alver MO, Alfredsen JA, Sigholt T. 2004. Dynamic modelling of pellet distribution in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) cages. Aquacultural Engineering. 31(1-2): 51-72.
  5. Alver MO, Skøien KR, Føre M, Aas TS, Oehme M, Alfredsen JA. 2016. Modelling of surface and 3D pellet distribution in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) cages. Aquacultural Engineering. 72-73: 20-29.
  6. Attia J, Millot S, Di-Poï C, Bégout ML, Noble C, Sanchez-Vazquez FJ, Terova G, Saroglia M, Damsgård B. 2012. Demand feeding and welfare in farmed fish. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 38(1): 107-118.
  7. Austreng E, Storebakken T, Åsgård T. 1987. Growth rate estimates for cultured Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout. Aquaculture. 60(2): 157-160.
  8. Einen O, Holmefjord I, Åsgård T, Talbot C. 1995. Auditing nutrient discharges from fish farms: theoretical and practical considerations. Aquaculture Research. 26: 701-713.
  9. Einen O, Mørkøre T, Thomassen MS. 1999. Feed ration prior to slaughter - a potential tool for managing product quality of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture. 178(1-2): 149-169.
  10. Gjøsæter J, Otterå H, Slinde E, Nedreaas K, Ervik A. 2008. Effekter af spillfôr på marine organismer. Bergen, Norway: Institute of Marine Research. Annual series. No. 1.11. In Norwegian.
  11. Gorle JMR, Terjesen BF, Summerfelt ST. 2019. Hydrodynamics of Atlantic salmon culture tank: Effect of inlet nozzle angle on the velocity field. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 158: 79-91.
  12. Grisdale-Helland B, Lemme A, Helland SJ. 2013. Threonine requirement for maintenance and efficiency of utilization for threonine accretion in Atlantic salmon smolts determined using increasing ration levels. Aquaculture. 372-375: 158-166.
  13. Helland SJ, Grisdale-Helland B, Nerland S. 1996. A simple method for the measurement of daily feed intake of groups of fish in tanks. Aquaculture. 139(1-2): 157-163.
  14. Jones HaC, Hansen LA, Noble C, Damsgård B, Broom DM, Pearce GP. 2010. Social network analysis of behavioural interactions influencing fin damage development in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) during feed-restriction. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 127(3): 139-151.
  15. Oehme M, Aas TS, Olsen HJ, Sørensen M, Hillestad M, Li Y, Åsgård T. 2014. Effects of dietary moisture content of extruded diets on physical feed quality and nutritional response in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture Nutrition. 20: 451-465.
  16. Oehme M, Aas TS, Sørensen M, Lygren I, Åsgård T. 2012. Feed pellet distribution in a sea cage using pneumatic feeding system with rotor spreader. Aquacultural Engineering. 51(0): 44-52.
  17. Richmond HE, Hrabik TR, Mensinger AF. 2004. Light intensity, prey detection and foraging mechanisms of age 0 year yellow perch. Journal of Fish Biology. 65(1): 195-205.
  18. Ryer CH, Olla BL. 1996. Growth depensation and aggression in laboratory reared coho salmon: the effect of food distribution and ration size. Journal of Fish Biology. 48(4): 686-694.
  19. Skretting. Fiskeføde [Internet]. Stavanger, Norway: Skretting; 2011 [cited 2019 12 July]. Available from: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwiXxfuKlejeAhXlqIsKHYR8BxIQFjAAegQIABAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.skrettingguidelines.com%2Freadimage.aspx%3Fpubid%3D5fc27f89-bdff-4284-84e7-233efe8d218a%26down%3Dtrue%26nocache%3Dtrue&usg=AOvVaw3lnAUSJ56o89ygVCxAt8gn. In Norwegian.
  20. Skøien KR, Aas TS, Alver MO, Romarheim OH, Alfredsen JA. 2016. Intrinsic settling rate and spatial diffusion properties of extruded fish feed pellets. Aquacultural Engineering. 74: 30-37.
  21. Symons PEK. 1971. Behavioural adjustment of population density to available food by juvenile Atlantic salmon. Journal of Animal Ecology. 40(3): 569-587.