Main Article Content


The study aimed to identify the most common dimensions of the future time perspective and to know the level of self-regulated learning among Yarmouk University students. It also aimed to investigate the predictive ability of the dimensions of the future time perspective in self-regulated learning. The study sample consisted of 704 students, 335 males and 369 females, who were selected based on a convenience sample method from among the students enrolled in the compulsory university requirements during the summer semester of the academic year 2017/2018. To achieve the objectives of the study, the Zimbardo and Boyed’s (1999) measure was used to measure the future time perspective, and Purdie’s scale for measuring self-regulated learning. The results showed that the future dimension was the most common among the sample of the study, and that the level of self-regulated learning was moderate, whether at the total score or the various dimensions. The study concluded that the dimensions of the future time perspective explained 18.8% of the variance in self-regulated learning.


Future time perspective self-regulated learning Yarmouk University

Article Details


  1. جارالله، سليمان وشرفي، محمد. (2017). تكييف قائمة زيمباردو لمنظور الزمن للغة العربية. مجلة شبكة العلوم النفسية، 23، 53-64.
  2. الجراح، عبد الناصر (2010). العلاقة بين التعلم المنظم ذاتيًا والتحصيل الأكاديمي لدى عينة من طلبة جامعة اليرموك. المجلة الأردنية في العلوم التربوية، 6(4)، 333-348.
  3. عبد الوهاب، صلاح (2011). المرونة العقلية وعلاقتها بكل من منظور زمن المستقبل وأهداف الإنجاز لدى أعضاء هيئة التدريس بالجامعة. مجلة بحوث التربية النوعية- جامعة المنصورة، 20، 20-78.
  4. Atanasio, P., Paixao, M., & De Silva, J. (2012). The influence of future time perspective in career decision-making: The mediating role of work hope. international studies in time perspective University of Coimbra, Portugal: University press.
  5. Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. (2004). Inherent association between academic delay of gratification, future time perspective, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 16 (1), 35-57.
  6. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6) 445-551.
  7. Brothers, A., Chui, H., & Diehl, M. (2014). Measuring future time perspective across adulthood: Development and evaluation of a brief multidimensional questionnaire. The Gerontologist, 54(6) 1075-1088.
  8. Brickman, S. (1999). How perceptions of the future influence achievement motivation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Norman, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 59,3344.
  9. Carstensen, L. (1991). Selectivity theory: social activity in life-span context, in Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, ed. Schaie K. W., editor. (New York, NY: Springer), PP 195–217.
  10. Cate, R., John, O. (2007). Testing models of the structure and development of future time perspective: maintaining a focus on opportunities in middle age. Psychology and Aging, 22(1), 186–201.
  11. Chasmar, J. (2017). Connections between future time perspective and self-regulated learning for mid-year engineering studies: a multiple case study. All Dissertations. 2013.
  12. Crockett, R., Weinman, J., & Hankins, M .(2009). Time orientation and health- related behavior: measurement in general population samples. Psychology and Health, 24(3), 333–350.
  13. Coudin, G., & Lima, M. (2011). Being well as time goes by: Future time perspective and well-being. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11(2) 219-232.
  14. De Bilde, J., Vansteenkiste, M., & Lens, W. (2011). Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory. Learning and Instruction, 21, 332–344.
  15. DeShon, R., & Gillespie, J. (2005). A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6) 1096-1127.
  16. Dowell, D., & Small, F. ( 2012). What is the impact of online materials on student self-regulated strategies? Journal of Marketing Education, 33(2) 140–148.
  17. Hedge, J., Borman, C., & Lammlein, S. (2006). The aging workforce: Realities, myths, and implications for organizations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  18. Henry, H., Zacher, H., & Desmettem, D. (2017). Future time perspective in the work context: A systematic review of quantitative studies. Front Psychology, 8, 1-22.
  19. Husman, J. Lynch, Ch., Hilpert, J. & Duggan, M. (2007). Validating measures of future time perspective for engineering students: steps toward improving engineering education. Paper presented at American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI, 2007.
  20. Kastenbaum, R., Carstensen L., Isaacowitz, D., Charles, S. (1999). Taking time seriously: a theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165 [PubMed][Cross Ref].
  21. Kauffman, D., & Husman, J. (2004). Effects of time perspective on student motivation: introduction to a special issue. Educational Psychology Review, 16 (1), 1-7.
  22. Keyser, J. (2013). Self-regulated learning and time perspective as predictors of academic performance in undergraduate economics studies. Unpublished Dissertation, University of the free state, south Africa.
  23. Kritzas, C., & Grobler, A. (2007). The relationship between learning strategies, motivation and future time perspective for grade 12 learners. Unpublished research report, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
  24. Kooij D., De Lange, A., Jansen P., Dikkers J. (2013). Beyond chronological age: examining perceived future time and subjective health as age-related mediators in relation to work-related motivations and well-being. Work and Stress, 27, 88–105. DOI:10.1080/02678373.2013.769328 [Cross Ref]
  25. Luszczynska, A., Gibbons, F., Piko, B. (2004). Self-regulatory cognitions, social comparison, and perceived peers’ behaviors as predictors of nutrition and physical activity: a comparison among adolescents in Hungary, Poland, Turkey, and USA. Psychology of Health, 19:577–593. DOI:10.1080/0887044042000205844 Cross Ref Web of Science Google Scholar.
  26. Miller, R., & Brickman, S. (2004). A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychology Review, 16(1), 9-33
  27. Murrel, A., & Mingrone, M. (1994). Correlates of temporal perspective. Perceptual and Motor skills, 78(3), 1331 – 1334.
  28. Montaliro, F., & Torres, M. (2004). Self-regulated learning: Current and future directions. Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 2(1),1–34.
  29. Nelson, K., Shell, D., Husman, J., Fishman, E., & Soh, L. (2015). Motivational and self- regulated learning profiles of students taking a foundational engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education,104(1),74-100.
  30. Petkoska, J., & Earl, J. (2009). Understanding the influence of demographic and psychological variables on retirement planning. Psychology and Aging 24(1), 245- 251.
  31. Phalet, K., Andriessen, I., & Lens, W. (2004). How future goals enhance motivation and learning in multicultural classrooms. Educational Psychology Review, 16, (1), 59-89.
  32. Pintrich, P. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self- regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459-470.
  33. Pintrich, P. (2004). A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self- Regulated Learning in College Students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.
  34. Qian, J., Lin, X., Han, Z., Tian, B., Chen, G., Wang, H. (2015). The impact of future time orientation on employees’ feedback-seeking behavior from supervisors and co- workers: the mediating role of psychological ownership. Journal of Management and Organization, 21(3), 1–14.
  35. Schmitt, A., Zacher, H., De Lange, A. (2013). Focus on opportunities as a boundary condition of the relationship between job control and work engagement: a multi-sample, multi-method study. European Journal of Work Organizational. Psychology, 22(5), 505–519.
  36. Schunk, D. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 71–86.
  37. Reshma, T. (2004). Cultural, gender and socio-economic difference in time perspective among adolescents. Magister Scientae, Faculty of Humanities, University of the Free Dtate. risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 1007–1023
  38. Tabar, M., & Zebradast, A. (2015). Predicting academic achievement based on dimensions of time perspective among university students. Biological Forum –An International Journal, 7(2) 1-6.
  39. Ultanir, E. (2012). An epistemological glance at the constructivist approach: Constructivist learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2),195–210.
  40. Wallace, M. (1956). Future time perspective in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 52, 240–245. DOI:10.1037/h0039899 [Pub Med] [Cross Ref].
  41. Wolters, C. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189-205.
  42. Zacher, H. (2013). Older job seekers’ job search intensity: the interplay of proactive personality, age and occupational future time perspective. Ageing and Society, 33(7), 1139– 1166.
  43. Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2009). Remaining time and opportunities at work: relationships between age, work characteristics, and occupational future time perspective. Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 487–493.
  44. Zacher H., Yang, J. (2016). Organizational climate for successful aging. Front Psychology, 4(7),1007.DOI:10.3389/fpsyg..01007 [PMC free article] [PubMed].
  45. Zebardast, A., Besharat, M., & Hghighatgoo, M. (2011). The relationship between self-regulation and time perspective in students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 939 – 943
  46. Zimbardo, P. (2002). Just think about it: Time to take our time. Psychology Today, 35(1) 62.
  47. Zimbardo, P., & Boyd, J. (1999). Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288. DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1271 [Cross Ref].
  48. Zimmerman, B. (2000). Self-efficacy: an essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91.
  49. Zimmerman, B., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614– 628.