Article Sidebar

Submitted
Oct 22, 2019
Published
Oct 22, 2019
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2197 Download : 547

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper focuses on investigating students’ reasons for their reluctance to attend faculty members’ office hours. Study participants included 500 male and female students from the Colleges of Engineering (n = 248) and Arts and Social Sciences (CASS) (n = 252) at Sultan Qaboos University (SQU). The study followed a descriptive-analytical approach, and a questionnaire was utilized to collect people’s views. The results of the study indicate that the rates of SQU students’ attendance to office hours were low, and some students (11.2%) do not attend at all as they consider these office hours a waste of time. The main reasons behind the students’ lack of interest in office hours were busy student timetables, conflicts between faculty office hours and students’ timetables, and easier and faster ways of getting information than visiting faculty members. Additional reasons were related to faculty members’ personalities and their discouraging attitudes toward attending office hours. The researchers recommend that SQU adopt a new strategy for encouraging faculty members to hold office hours, familiarizing students with the importance of office hours and assigning part of a course’s grades to meeting with faculty members’ office hours.

Keywords

Office hours students’ reluctance faculty members Sultan Qaboos University.

Article Details

References

  1. Anderson, L., & Carta-Falsa, J. (2002). Factors that make faculty and student relationships effective. College Teaching, 50(4), 134-138.
  2. Clark, R., Walker, M., & Keith, S. (2002). Experimentally assessing the student impacts of out-of-class communication: Office visits and the student experience. Journal of College Student Development, 43(6), 824-837.
  3. Cotten, S. R., & Wilson, B. (2006). Student-faculty interactions: Dynamics and determinants. Higher Education, 51(4), 487-519.
  4. Dika, S. (2012). Relations with faculty as social capital for college students: Evidence from Puerto Rico. Journal of College Student Development, 5(4), 596-610.
  5. Griffin, W., Cohen, S. D., Berndtson R., Burson, K. M., Camper, K. M., Chen Y., & Smith, M. A. (2014). Starting the conversation: An exploratory study of factors that influence student office hour use. College Teaching, 62, 94-99.
  6. Guerrero, M., & Rod, A. B. (2013). Engaging in office hours: A study of student-faculty interaction and academic performance. Journal of Political Science Education, 9(4), 403-416.
  7. Jaasma, M.A., & Koper, R.J. (1999). The relationship of student-faculty out-of-class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48, 41-47.
  8. Robinson, R. J., Culver, D., Schertzer, M. J., Landschoot, T. P., & Hensel, E. C. (2014). Understanding the causes for low student office hour attendance. Paper presented at the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE), Montreal, Canada.
  9. Schertzer, M. J., Robinson, R., Landschoot, T., Ghosh, A., Liberson, A., & Hensel, E. (2014). Effect of office hour participation on student performance. Paper presented at the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE), Montreal, Canada.
  10. Smith, M., Chen, Y., Berndtson, R., Burson, K. M., & Griffin, W. (2017). “Office hours are kind of weird”: reclaiming a resource to foster student faculty interaction. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching,12, 14-29.
  11. Terenzini, P., Springer, L., Pascarella, E., & Nora, A. (1995). Academic and out-of class influences on students’ intellectual orientations. Review of Higher Education, 19(2), 23-44.