Main Article Content

Abstract

The present study aims to examine the predictive effect of self-regulated writing strategies of students’ writing performance and explore the differences between higher and lower writing achievers in self-regulated writing strategies. A total of 202 English as a foreign language students at  the Northern Border University in Saudi Arabia volunteered to participate in this study. A Writing Strategies for Self-Regulated Learning Questionnaire and a Writing Test were administered to compare the differences between high and low writing proficient learners in Self-Regulated Learning. Pearson correlation coefficient, multiple regression analysis, and independent-samples t-test were calculated.  The results showed that both text processing and course memory strategies predicted the writing performance of the participants. Results also revealed significant differences in course memory and feedback handling strategies between higher and lower writing achievers. The findings also indicated a low relative contribution to the course memory and text processing in predicting writing performance. These strategies explained only 6.4% of the total variance of writing performance. Based on these findings, practical implications and recommendations for future research were provided.

Keywords

Predictive effects self-regulated strategies writing performance English as a foreign lan-guage.

Article Details

References

  1. Abadikhah, S., Aliyan, Z. & Talebi, S. (2018). EFL students’ attitudes towards self-regulated learning strategies in aca-demic writing. Issues in Educational Re-search, 28, 1-17.
  2. Al-Alwan, A. (2008). Self-regulated learn-ing in high and low achieving students at AlHussein Bin Talal University (AHU) in Jordan. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 1(1), 1-13.
  3. Al-Harthy, I., Was, C., & Isaacson, R. (2010). Goals, efficacy and metacognitive self-regulation a path analysis. International Journal of Education, 2(1):1-20.
  4. Ali, S. (2016). Academic writing challenges at Universities in Saudi Arabia and so-lutions. Smart Moves journal IJELLH, 4 (10), 291-298.
  5. Al-Khairy, M. (2013). Saudi English-major undergraduates' academic writing prob-lems: A Taif University perspective. Eng-lish Language Teaching,6(6), 1-12.
  6. Andrade, M. & Evans, N. (2013). Principles and practices for response in second lan-guage writing: Developing self-regulated learners. New York: Routledge.
  7. Ashman, A. & Conway, R. (2017). Cogni-tive strategies for special education: pro-cess-based instruction. London: Imprint Routledge.
  8. Ben‐Eliyahu, A. & Bernacki, M. (2015). Addressing complexities in self‐regulated learning: A focus on con-textual factors, contingencies, and dy-namic relations. Metacognition and Learn-ing, 10, 1– 13. Doi:10.1007/s11409-015-9134-6.
  9. Chand, Z. (2014). Language learning strat-egy use and its impact on proficiency in academic writing of tertiary students. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 511–521.
  10. Csizer, K. & Tanko, G. (2015). English ma-jor’s self-regulatory control strategy use in academic writing and its relation to L2 motivation. Applied Linguistics, 38(3), 386-404. Doi:10.1093/applin/amv033.
  11. Dhanapala, K. (2006). University EFL and ESL learners’ strategy use: A study in Sri Lankan and Japanese contexts. JACET Chukoku-Shikoku Chapter Research Bulle-tin,3, 53–70.
  12. Erdogan, T. (2018). The investigation of self-regulation and language learning strategies. Universal Journal of Education-al Research, 6(7), 1477–1485.
  13. Fadda, H. (2012). Difficulties in academic writing: From the perspective of King Saud University postgraduate students. English Language Teaching, 5(3), 123–130.
  14. Kizilcec, R., Perez-Sanagustın, M., & Mal-donado, J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses. Computers and Education, 104, 18–33. Doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
  15. Lane, K., Graham, S., Harris, K., Little, L., Sandmel, K., & Brindle, M. (2010). Story writing: The effects of self-regulated strategy development for second grade students with writing and behavioral difficulties. Journal of Special Education, 44, 107–128.
  16. Nabizadeh, S., Hajian, S., Sheikhan, Z., & Rafiei, F. (2019). Prediction of academic achievement based on learning strate-gies and outcome expectations among medical students. BMC Medical Educa-tion, 19(99), 1-11. Doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1527-9.
  17. Nasihah, M. &Cahyono, B. (2017). Lan-guage learning strategies, motivation, and writing achievement of Indonesian EFL students. Arab World English Journal, 8(1), 250–263.
  18. Negari, G. (2011). A study on strategy in-struction and EFL learners’ writing skill. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 299–307. Doi:10.5539/ijel.v1n2p299
  19. Olivares-Cuhat, G. (2002). Learning strate-gies and achievement in the Spanish writing classroom: A case study. Foreign Language Annals,35(5), 561–570.
  20. Oxford, R. (2013). Teaching and researching language learning strategies (2nd ed.). UK: Pearson.
  21. Pascoe, L., Spencer-Smith, M., Giallo, R., Seal, M., Georgiou-Karistianis, N., Nosarti, C., … Anderson, P. (2018). Intrinsic motivation and aca-demic performance in school-age chil-dren born extremely preterm: the contri-bution of working memory. Learning and Individual Differences, 64, 22–32. Doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.04.005.
  22. Rustam, N., Hamra, A., &Weda, S. (2015). The language learning strategies used by students of Merchant Marine Studies Polytechnics Makassar. ELT Worldwide, 2(2),77–94.
  23. Sabourin, J., Shores, L., Mott, B., & Lester, J. (2012). Predicting student self-regulation strategies in game-based learning environments. In: S. Cerri, W. Clancey, G. Papadourakis, & K. Panour-gia (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 141-150). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  24. Setiyadi, A., Sukirlan, M., &Mahpul. (2016). How successful learners employ learn-ing strategies in an EFL setting in the Indonesian context. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 28–38. doi:10.5539/elt.v9n8p28.
  25. Schunk, D. & Rice, J. (1986). Extended at-tributions' feedback: Sequence effects during remedial reading instruction. Journal of Early Adolescence, 6, 55-66.
  26. Taheri, H., Sadighi, F., Bagheri, M.,&Bavali, M. (2020). Investigating the relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ use of language learning strategies and foreign language skills achievement. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1–38.
  27. Teng, L. (2016). Changes in teachers’ beliefs after a professional development project for teaching writing: Two Chinese cases. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42, 106–109.
  28. Teng, F. & Huang, J. (2018). Predictive ef-fects of writing strategies for self‐regulated learning on secondary school learners’ EFL writing proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 232-247. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.462.
  29. Teng, L. & Zhang, L. (2016). A question-naire-based validation of multidimen-sional models of self-regulated learning strategies. Modern Language Journal, 100, 674–701.
  30. Wang, C. & Bai, B. (2017). Validating the instruments to measure ESL/EFL learn-ers’ self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulated learning strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 51, 931–947. Doi:10.1002/tesq.355.
  31. Wigfield, A., Klauda, S., & Cambria, J. (2011). Influences on the development of academic self-regulatory processes. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 33–48). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
  32. Winne, P. (2011). A cognitive and Metacog-nitive analysis of self-regulated learn-ing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learn-ing and performance (pp. 15–32). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
  33. Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Development of self-regulated learning: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Edu-cational Psychology, 16, 307-313.
  34. Zimmerman, B. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17. Doi:10.1207/s15326985ep25012.
  35. Zimmerman, B. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self‐regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zim-merman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Hand-book of self‐regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49– 64). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
  36. Zimmerman, B. (2013). From cognitive modelling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psy-chologist, 48(3), 135–147. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2013.794676.
  37. Zimmerman, B. & Risemberg, R. (1997). Caveats and recommendations about self-regulation of writing: A social cog-nitive rejoinder. Contemporary Education-al Psychology, 22, 115–122.