Article Sidebar

Submitted
Apr 17, 2017
Published
Dec 1, 2001
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 734 Download : 388

Main Article Content

Abstract

The industrial estates in India are dominated by small and medium scale industries, which are posing a serious threat to the environment by virtue of discharging effluents of a polluting nature. The problems become severe due to the presence of heavy metals in the effluents. Chromium is widely used in a number of industries such as electroplating, metal finishing, cooling towers, dyes, paints, anodising and leather tanning industries. The toxicity of chromium (VI) is well known and is considered a hazard to the health of humans and animals. The presence of chromium (VI) in aquatic environments at high concentrations is also lethal to marine species. The treatment of chromium bearing effluents have been reported through several methods, such as chemical reduction,  precipitation, ion exchange, electrochemical reduction, evaporation, reverse osmosis and adsorption. However among these, adsorption is found to be highly effective, inexpensive and an easy method to operate. India is an agricultural country and generates a considerable amount of agricultural wastes such as sugar cane bagassess, coconut jute, nut shell, rice straw, rice husk, waste tea leaves, ground nut husk, crop wastes, peanut hulls and fertilizer wastes. Successful studies on these materials could be beneficial to developing countries and could be easily applied as adsorbents for the removal of chromium from wastewater. Most of the previous work highlights the use of commercial activated carbon but these adsorbents are relatively expensive and less feasible to be used in developing countries. Keeping these in view batch experiments have been designed to study the feasibility of sugar cane bagasse to remove chromium (VI) from the aqueous solutions. While evaluationg the impact of various parameters, such as adsorbent does, contact time, initial concentration and pH on chromium removal efficiency, the results indicate a prominent effect of pH on the chromium reduction by the adsorbent used in the present study.   

Keywords

Adsorption Toxicity Sugarcane Bagasse and Chromium.

Article Details

References

  1. AYUB, S; ALI, S.I; KHAN, N.A; RAO, R.A.K. 1999. Extraction of Chromium from the wastewater by Adsorption, Environmental Pollution Cont. Journal, 2(5): 27-31.
  2. AYUB, S; ALI, S.I.; KHAN, N.A; HASAN, S.D. Dec1998. Treatment of Wastewater by Agricultural Wastes, Environmental Pollution Cont.Journal.1(2): Standard Methods for the Analysis Water and Wastewater. 17th ed. APH, AWWA, WPCF, Washington D.C, 1989, 5-8.
  3. BENEFIELD, L.D; JADLEINS, J.F; WEAND, B.L. 1982. Process Chemistry for Water and Wastewater Treatment, Prentice-Hall, Inc; Engle wood Cliffs, New Jersey.
  4. CHAND, S.A; AGGARWAL, V.K; KUMAR, P, 1994. Removal of Hexavelent Chromium from the Wastewater by Adsorption, Indian J. Environ.Hlth 36(3): 151-158.
  5. DEO, N. ALI, M. 1992. Use of a low cost material as an adsorbent in the removal of Cr(VI) from the dilute aqueous solution, IJEP. 12(6): 439-411.
  6. HUANG, C.P.WU. M.H. 1975. Chromium removal by carbon adsorption. J.Water pollut.Cont.Fed.47: 243-46.
  7. LAL, J; SINGH, D.K., 1992. Removal of chromium (VI) from the Aqueous Solution using Waste Tealleaves Carbon. Indian J. Environ.Hlth 34: 108-113.
  8. METACALF, L; EDDY, H.P.1994.Wastewater Engineering Reuse and Disposal, Tata McGrow Hill Pub.Co; New Delhi,
  9. PERIASAMY, K; SRINIVASAN, K; MURUGAN P.K., 1991. Studies on chromium (VI) removal by Activated Groundnut Husk Carbon, Indian J. Environ.Hlth, 31(4): 433-439.
  10. SATYANARAYAN, S., 1995. Sorption of Cr (VI) and Cr (III) from Water by Bitruninous Coal, M.Tech. Thesis, IIT Kanpur.
  11. SHARMA, D.C; FORSTER, C.F, 1993.Removal of Hexvalent Chromium using Sphagnum Mors Peet, Wat.Res, 27(7): 1201-08.
  12. SIDDIQUI, Z.M; PAROOR, S, 1994. Removal of chromium (VI) by different Adsorbents–A comparative Study.IJEP, 14(4): 273-278.