Article Sidebar

Submitted
Apr 25, 2017
Published
Jun 1, 2005
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 292 Download : 187

Main Article Content

Abstract

In this paper, a direct realization procedure is presented that brings a general 2-D polynomial system matrix to generalized state space (GSS) form, such that all the relevant properties including the zero structure of the system matrix are retained. It is shown that the transformation linking the original 2-D polynomial system matrix with its associated GSS form is zero coprime system equivalence. The exact nature of the resulting system matrix in GSS form and the transformation involved are established. 

 

 

Keywords

2-D Systems system matrix generalized state space form zero coprime system equivalence invariant polynomials invariant zeros grobner bases.

Article Details

References

  1. ATTASI, S. 1973. Systemes lineaires a deux indices, Technical Report 31, IRIA. FORNASINI,
  2. E. and MARCHESINI, G. 1976. State space realization theory of two-dimensional filters, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control AC-21, 4: 484-492.
  3. FUHRMANN, P.A. 1977. On strict system equivalence and similarity, Int. J. Control 25(1): 5–10.
  4. GIVONE, D.D. and ROESSER, R.P. 1972. Multidimensional linear iterative circuits- General properties, IEEE Trans. Computers AC-21, 10: 1067-1073.
  5. JOHNSON, D.S. 1993. Coprimeness in multidimensional system theory and symbolic computation, PhD thesis, Loughborough University of Technology, UK.
  6. KACZOREK, T. 1988. The singular general model of 2-D systems and its solution, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 33, 11: 1060-1061.
  7. LEVY, B.C. 1981. 2-D polynomial and rational matrices and their applications for the modelling of 2-D dynamical systems, PhD thesis, Stanford University, USA.
  8. PUGH, A.C. and EL-NABRAWY, E.M.O. 2003. Zero structures of n-D systems, Proceedings Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, Rhodes (Greece).
  9. PUGH, A.C., MCINERNEY, S.J., M. HOU and HAYTON, G.E. 1996. A transformation for 2-D systems and its invariants, in Proceedings of the 35th IEEE conference on decision and control, Kobe (Japan).
  10. PUGH, A.C., MCINERNEY, S.J., BOUDELLIOUA, M.S., JOHNSON, D.S. and HAYTON, G.E. 1998. A transformation for 2-D linear systems and a generalization of a theorem of Rosenbrock, Int. J. Control, 71(3): 491-503.
  11. PUGH, A.C., MCINERNEY, S.J., BOUDELLIOUA, M.S. and HAYTON, G.E. 1998. Matrix pencil equivalents of a general 2-D polynomial matrix, Int. J. Control, 71(6): 1027-1050.
  12. SONTAG, E.D. 1980. On generalized inverses of polynomial and other matrices, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control AC-25(3): 514-517.
  13. YOULA, D.C. and GNAVI, G. 1979. Notes on n-dimensional system theory, IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems CAS-26(2): 105-111.
  14. ZAK, S.H. 1984. On state-space models for systems described by partial differential equations, in Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE conference on decision and control, Las Vegas (USA).
  15. ZERZ, E. 1996. Primeness of multivariate polynomial matrices, Systems and Control Letters 29: 139-145.