Main Article Content


 The objective of this work was to investigate the effects of material anisotropy on the yielding and hardening behavior of 2024T351 aluminum alloy using isotropic and anisotropic yield criteria. Anisotropy may be induced in a material during the manufacturing through processes like rolling or forging. This induced anisotropy gives rise to the concept of orientation-dependent material properties such as yield strength, ductility, strain hardening, fracture strength, or fatigue resistance. Inclusion of the effects of anisotropy is essential in correctly predicting the deformation behavior of a material. In this study, uniaxial tensile tests were first performed in all three rolling directions, L , and S , for smooth bar specimens made from hot rolled plate of Al2024 alloy. The experimental results showed that the L - and T -directions yielded higher yield strengths and a greater percentage of elongation before fracture than the S -direction. Subsequently, finite element analysis of tensile specimens was performed using isotropic (von Mises) and anisotropic (Hill) yield criteria to predict the onset of yielding and hardening behaviors during the course of deformation. Hill's criterion perfectly fitted with the test data in the S -direction, but slightly underestimated the yield strength in L -direction. The results indicated that the Hill yield criterion is the most suitable one to predict the onset of yielding and hardening behaviors for 2024T351 aluminum alloy in all directions.



Deformation behaviour Anisotropy Downhole expandable tubular Finite element analysis

Article Details

How to Cite
Khan, R. (2013). Anisotropic Deformation Behavior of Al2024T351 Aluminum Alloy. The Journal of Engineering Research [TJER], 10(1), 80–87.


  1. Barlat F, Becker RC, Hayashida Y, Maeda Y, Yanagawa M, Chung K, Brem JC, Lege DJ, Matsui K, Murtha SJ, Hattori S (1997), Yielding description for solution strengthened aluminum alloys. International Journal of Plasticity 13:385- 401.
  2. Barlat F, Lege DJ, Brem JC (1991), A six-component yield function for anisotropic materials. International Journal of Plasticity 7:693-712.
  3. Bron F, Besson J ( 2004), A yield function for anisotropic materials: Application to aluminum alloys. International Journal of Plasticity 20(4- 5):937-963.
  4. Bron F, Besson J (2006), Simulation of the ductile tearing for two grades of 2024 aluminum alloy thin sheets. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 73(11):1531-1552.
  5. Bron F, Besson J, Pineau A (2004), Ductile rupture in thin sheets of two grades of 2024 aluminum alloy. Materials Science and Engineering A 380(1-2):356-364.
  6. Campo D, Williams C, Fillippov A, Cook L, Brisco D, Dean B, Ring L (2003), Monodiameter drilling liner - From Concept to Reality Paper SPE 79790, presented at the drilling conference held in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Hershey AV (1954), The plasticity of an isotropic aggregate of anisotropic face-centered cubic crystals. Journal of Applied Mechanics 21:241-249.
  7. Hill R (1954), The mathematical theory of plasticity. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
  8. Hosford WF (1972), A generalize isotropic yield criterion. Journal of Applied Mechanics 39:607-609.
  9. Hosford WF (1996), On the crystallographic basis of yield criteria. Textures Microstructure 26-27:479- 493.
  10. Karafillis AP, Boyce MC (1993), A general anisotropic yield criterion using bounds and a transformation weighting tensor. Journal of Mechanics of Physics and Solids 41:1859-1886.
  11. Lam DF, Menzemer CC, Srivatsan TS (2010), A study to evaluate and understand the response of aluminum alloy 2026 subjected to tensile deformation. Materials and Design 31(1):166-175.
  12. Lee HT, Shaue GH (1999), The thermomechanical behavior for aluminum alloy under uniaxial tensile loading. Materials Science and Engineering A 268(1-2):154-164.
  13. Logan RW, Hosford WF (1980), Upper-bound anisotropic yield locus calculations assuming <111> pencil glide. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 22:419430.
  14. Mimaroglu A, Yenihayat OF (2003), Modelling the superplastic deformation process of 2024 aluminium alloys under constant strain rate: Use of finite element technique. Materials and Design 24(3):189-195.
  15. Nakai M, Eto T (2000), New aspect of development of high strength aluminum alloys for aerospace applications. Material Science and Engineering A 285(1-2):62-68.
  16. Pervez T, Qamar SZ, Seibi AC, Al-Jahwari FK (2008), Use of SET in Cased and Open Holes: Comparison between Aluminum and Steel. Materials and Design 29:811-817.
  17. Schmitt C, Lipinski P (1998), Modelling of the elasto- plastic behavior of rolled aluminium alloy for forming applications. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 74(1-3):14-22.
  18. Shanmuga SN, Murugan N (2010), Tensile behavior of dissimilar friction stir welded joints of aluminium alloys. Materials and Design 31(9):4184- 4193.
  19. Srivatsan TS, Vasudevan S, Park L (2007), The tensile deformation and fracture behavior of friction stir welded aluminum alloy 2024. Materials Science and Engineering A 466(1-2):235-245.
  20. Starke EA, Staley JT (1996), Application of modern aluminum alloys to aircraft. Progress in Aerospace Science 32(2-3):131-172.
  21. Steglich D, Brocks W, Heerens J, Pardoen T (2008), Anisotropic ductile fracture of Al 2024 alloys. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 75:3692-3706.
  22. Tresca H (1864), On the flow of solid bodies subjected to high pressures. In: Comptes-Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences Paris 59:754-756.
  23. von Mises R (1913), Mechanik der festen Körper im plastisch- deformablen Zustand. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 582- 592:doi:citeulike-article-id:6897288.