Main Article Content

Abstract

 The basic aim of this paper is to increase awareness amongst the researchers and to draw their attention towards the present approach to deal with the cryogenic treatment for the nonferrous metals. Cryogenic treated nonferrous metals will exhibit longer wear and more durability. During metal making process, when solidification takes place, some molecules get caught in a random pattern. The molecules do move about at subzero and deep cryogenic treatment slowly. In this experimental study, the effect of cryogenic treatment on microstructure changes and the hardness properties varies for LM25 alloy and LM25-SiC metal matrix composite at -196°C. It is analyzed for different durations. The execution of cryogenic treatment on both alloy and MMCs changed the distribution of

Keywords

MMCs Cryogenic treatment Microstructure Micro hardness.

Article Details

How to Cite
Elango, G., Raghunath, B., & Thamizhmaran, K. (2014). Effect of Cryogenic Treatment on Microstructure and Micro Hardness of Aluminium (LM25) - SiC Metal Matrix Composite. The Journal of Engineering Research [TJER], 11(1), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.24200/tjer.vol11iss1pp64-68

References

  1. Bensely A, Senthilkumar D, Mohan LD, Nagarajan G, Rajadurai A (2007), Effect of cryogenic treatment on tensile behavior of case carburized steel- 815M1. Materials Characterization 58(5):485- 491.
  2. Elango G, Raghunath BK, Palanikumar K (2013), Sliding wear of LM25 aluminium alloy with 7.5% SiC + 2.5% TiO2 and 2.5% SiC + 7.5% TiO2 and 2.5% SiC + 7.5% TiO2 hybrid composites. DOI: 10.1177/0021998313496592 1-10.
  3. Govindan PPK, Nageswara RB, Srivastava VK (2000), Residual strength of aluminum-lithium alloy center surface crack tension specimens at cryogenic temperatures. Cryogenics 40:789-795.
  4. Guozhi Ma, Ding C, Zhenhua C, Wei Li (2010), Effect of cryogenic treatment on microstructure and mechanical behaviors of the Cu-based bulk metallic glass matrix composite. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 505(1):319-323.
  5. Jiang XQ, Ning Li, Hong He, Zhang XJ, Hao Y (2009), Effect of cryogenic treatment on mechanical properties and microstructure of 3102 Al alloy. Materials Science Forum 546-49(2):845- 848.
  6. Kaveh MA, Alireza T, Farzad K (2009), Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on microstructure, creep and wear behaviors of AZ91 magnesium alloy. Materials Science and Engineering A 523:27-31.
  7. Khomamizadeh F (2009), Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on microstructure, creep and wear behaviors of AZ91 magnesium alloy. Materials Science and Engineering A 523:27-31.
  8. Lulay KE, Khan K, Chaaya D (2002), The Effect of Cryogenic Treatments on 7075 Aluminum alloy. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 11(5):479-480.
  9. Mahadevana K, Raghukandanb K, Pai UTS, Pillai BC (2008), Influence of precipitation hardening parameters on the fatigue strength of AA 6061- SiCp composite. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 198:241-247.
  10. Mehta DS, Masood SH, Song WQ (2004), Investigation of wear properties of magnesium and aluminum alloys for automotive applications. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 155- 156:1526-1531.
  11. Sendooran S, Raja P (2011), Metallurgical investigation on cryogenic treated HSS tool. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 3(5):3992-3996.
  12. Woodcraft, Adam L (2005), Recommended values for the thermal conductivity of aluminium of different purities in the cryogenic to room temperature range and a comparison with copper. Cryogenics 45(9):626-636.
  13. Zhirafar S, Rezaeian A, Pugh M (2007), Effect of cryogenic treatment on the mechanical properties of 4340 steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 186(1-3):298-303.