Main Article Content


This study details an electromagnetic (EM) field radiation detector system that was developed for near-field low-frequency energy applications. The prototype constitutes the use of a dual-band monopole antenna system as a probe along with a detecting circuit. Furthermore, the prototype was equipped with a qualitative EM radiation strength display unit at its output stage. For proof of concept, the detecting probe was implemented on a printed-circuit board. Both numerical simulations were based on PSpice software (Cadence Design Systems, Inc., San Jose, California, USA) and measurements are presented and discussed. The EM field detector aimed to sense any potential sources of EM radiation from mobile phone units as well as WiFi access points, simultaneously, which is accomplished with the use of the dual-band antenna system. Such a sensitive detector has useful application as a stand-alone monitoring probe for troubleshooting as well as to identify sources of EM radiation interference threats for industrial high-speed electronic devices. Additionally, such a sensor is a potentially useful tool for site testing and scanning for optimal locations of base station masks for telecommunication service providers.  Other prototypes are also presented to illustrate the usefulness of such detectors in some of the aforementioned applications.



Antenna Electromagnetic radiation Detector circuit Probe Sensor.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bait-Suwailam, M. (2015). Electromagnetic Field Detector Circuit for Low- Frequency Energy Applications. The Journal of Engineering Research [TJER], 12(1), 69–80.


  1. Advisory Group on Non-ionizing Radiation (1992), Electromagnetic fields and the risk of cancer report. National Radiological Protection Board 3(1):1–138.
  2. Advisory Group on Non-ionizing Radiation (1994), Health effects related to the use of visual display units report. National Radiological Protection Board 5(2):1–75.
  3. Archambeault B, Ramahi O, Brench C (2001), EMI/EMC computational modeling handbook, 2nd ed, Boston: Kluwer.
  4. Bait-Suwailam M, Alavikia B, Ramahi O (2014), Reduction of electromagnetic radiation from apertures and enclosures using electromagnetic bandgap structures. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology 4(5):929–937.
  5. Bait-Suwailam M, Al-Balushi I, Al-Sadairi M, Al- Alawi M, Al-Risi S (2014), Electromagnetic radiation probe using a detector circuit with a dual-band antenna system. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Electronics Design (ICED), Penang, Malaysia.
  6. Balanis C (2005), Antenna theory: Analysis and design 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, Inc. Bernardi P, Cavagnaro M, Pisa S, Piuzzi E (1998), SAR distribution and temperature increase in an anatomical model of the human eye exposed to the field radiated by the user antenna in a wireless LAN. IEEE Transmission on Microwave Theory and Techniques 46(12):2074–2082.
  7. Brench C, Brench B (1989), Effects of cable and peripheral placement on radiated emissions. Proceedings of the IEEE National Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility May 23-25, 351–356.
  8. Buchanan WJ, Gupta NK, Arnold JM (1994), Application of 3D finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method to predict radiation from a PCB with high speed pulse propagation. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Electromagnetic Compatibility, University of Manchester 287-291.
  9. Datang Telecom Technology & Industry Group (2013), Evolution, convergence, and innovation—White paper on 5G technology. Retrieved from: upload/accessory/201312/201312919445526537 2.pdf.
  10. Fairchild (2014), BC546/BC547/BC548/ BC549/ BC550 NPN epitaxial silicon transistor. Retrieved from: ds/ BC/BC547.pdf.
  11. Hanna S, Motai Y, Varhue W, Titcomb S (2009), Very low-frequency electromagnetic field detector with data acquisition. IEEE Transmission on Instrumentation and Measurement 58(1):129–140.
  12. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (1998), Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Physics Journal 74(4):494–522.
  13. IEEE Standard Std. (1994), Procedures for measurement of power frequency electric and magnetic fields from AC power lines. IEEE Std 644. DOI: 10.1109/IEEESTD. 1995. 122621.
  14. Lin J (2009), Specific absorption rates (SAR) induced in head tissues by microwave radiation from cell phones. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 42(5):138–140.
  15. Mann J, Lee R, Aragon T, Bhatia R (2001), Radio frequency radiation from broadcast transmission towers and cancer: A review of epidemiology studies. Retrieved from: files/reports/ Studies Data/ RadioFreqRadRpt032001.pdf.
  16. Park H, Park H, Lee H (2013), A simple method of estimating the radiated emission from a cable attached to a mobile device. IEEE Transmission on Electromagnetic Compatibility 55(2):257–264. 80
  17. Rowley J, Waterhouse R (1999), Performance of shorted microstrip patch antennas for mobile communications handsets at 1800 MHz. IEEE Transmission on Antennas and Propagation 47(5):815–822.
  18. Seabury D (2005), An update on SAR standards and the basic requirements for SAR assessment. Retrieved from: sar_lo.pdf.
  19. Texas Instruments (2014), LMx58-N Low-Power, Dual-Operational Amplifiers. Retrieved from: n.pdf. Ulaby FT, Michielssen E, Ravaioli U (2014), Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics 6th ed. London: Pearson Education Limited 30–31.
  20. World Health Organization (2011), Electromagnetic fields and public health: Mobile phones. Fact sheet No. 193. Retrieved from: s193/en/.