Main Article Content


Achieving an estimation of viscosity in crude oil binary mixtures is often difficult because the relationship of viscosity, to the fraction of each crude oil, and many other parameters and constants is comply.  This relationship can be expressed by mathematical models with different variables. Besides the known models for predicting the viscosity of crude oil mixtures, the petroleum industry demands other models which give accurate predictions. In this work, two new empirical models have been developed for the calculation of the viscosity of binary crude oil blends. Two techniques—least square (LS) and genetic algorithm (GA)—were used to determine the parameters of the proposed models. Dynamic viscosity of 12 sets of crude oil blends at 298.15 K and 25 different shear rates were measured, resulting in 300 sets of binary data. Moreover, 700 sets of kinematic viscosity binary data were collected from literature sources and used along with 200 of the 300 sets of experimental binary data with a wide range of American Petroleum Institute (API) gravity (9.89–41.2) and viscosity (1.054–165,860 cSt) to examine existing available models as well as the newly developed models in this study. The remaining 100 experimental data points which were not used in the regression process were used for validating the models. The results in terms of the absolute average relative deviation (AARD%) were 33.546 and 14.195 for the LS method and 13.113 and 13.672 for the GA method for proposed models one and two, respectively. The results of statistical parameters based on the GA and LS methods showed that the GA is a superior method for new model parameter estimation as compared with the traditional LS technique. The GA-based models developed in this study provided the highest accuracy for viscosity calculation of the crude oil blends over all existing models in the literature.  




Viscosity Crude oil Binary mixture Genetic algorithm Least square Optimization.

Article Details

How to Cite
Al-Maamari, R., Vakili-Nezhaada, G., & Vatani, M. (2015). Experimental and Modeling Investigations of the Viscosity of Crude Oil Binary Blends: New Models Based on the Genetic Algorithm Method. The Journal of Engineering Research [TJER], 12(1), 81–91.


  1. Al-Besharah JM (1989), The effect of blending on selected physical properties of crude oils and their products. PhD dissertation: University of Aston, Birmingham, Alabama.
  2. Alvarez VH, Larico R, Ianos Y, Aznar M (2008), Parameter estimation for VLE calculation by global minimization: The genetic algorithm. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering 25:409–418.
  3. Arrhenius SA (1887), Uber die Dissociation der in Wasser gelosten Stoffe. Zeitschrift Fur Physikalische Chemie-Leipzig 1:631–648.
  4. Baird CT (1989), IV Guide to petroleum product blending. Austin (TX): HPI Consultants, Inc.
  5. Bingham EC (1914), The viscosity of binary mixtures. The Journal of Physical Chemistry 18:157–165.
  6. Bonilla-Petriciolet A, Fateen SEK, Rangaiah GP (2013), Assessment of capabilities and limitations of stochastic global optimization methods for modeling mean activity coefficients of ionic liquids. Fluid Phase Equilibria 340:15-26.
  7. Centeno G, Sánchez-Reyna G, Ancheyta J, Muñoz JAD, Cardona N (2011), Testing various mixing rules for calculation of viscosity of petroleum blends. Fuel 90:3561-3570.
  8. Chamkalani A, Maesoumi A, Sameni A (2013), An intelligent approach for optimal prediction of gas deviation factor using particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 14:132-143.
  9. Cragoe CS (1933), Changes in the viscosity of liquids with temperature, pressure and Composition. Process World Petroleum congress London 2:529–541.
  10. Diaz RM, Bernardo MI, Fernbndez AM, Folgueras MB (1996), Prediction of the viscosity of lubricating oil blends at any temperature. Fuel 75:574-578.
  11. Holland JH (1992), Algoritmos geneticos. Investigacion Y Ciencia 192:38–45.
  12. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983), Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680.
  13. Koval EJ (1963), A method for predicting the performance of unstable miscible displacement in heterogeneous media. SPE Journal 3:145-154.
  14. Maddinelli G, Pavoni S (2013), Method for predicting the properties of crude oils by the application of neural networks. US 20130103627 A1.
  15. MathWorks (2004–2006), Genetic algorithm and direct search toolbox: Users Guide. Copyright by the Math Works, Natick, Mass.
  16. Maxwell JB (1950), Data Book on Hydrocarbons: Application to Process Engineering. Princeton, New Jersey: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.
  17. Miadonye A, Latour N, Puttagunta VR (2000), A correlation for viscosity and solvent mass fraction of bitumen-diluent mixtures. Petroleum Science and Technology 18:1–14.
  18. Parkash S (2003), Refining Processes Handbook. Oxford, UK: Elsevier (Gulf Professional Publishing).
  19. Preechakul C, Kheawhom S (2009), Modified genetic algorithm with sampling techniques for chemical engineering optimization. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 15:110-118.
  20. Price KV, Storn RM, Lampinen JA (2005), Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
  21. Rahmes VH, Nelson WL (1948), Viscosity blending relationships of heavy petroleum oils. Analytical Chemistry 20:912-915.
  22. Rangaiah GP (2001), Evaluation of genetic algorithms and simulated annealing for phase equilibrium and stability problems. Fluid Phase Equilibria 187–188:83–109.
  23. Riazi MR (2005), Characterization and properties of petroleum fractions, first ed. American Society and Testing Materials, ASTM Manual Series: MNL50, USA.
  24. Sahoo RK, Banerjee T, Ahmad SA, Khanna A (2006), Improved binary parameters using GA for multi-component aromatic extraction: NRTL model without and with closure equations. Fluid Phase Equilibria 239:107–119.
  25. Sahoo RK, Banerjee T, Khanna A (2007), UNIQUAC interaction parameters with closure for imidazolium based ionic liquid systems using genetic algorithm. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 85:833–853.
  26. Shan-peng H, Wen-xue J, Jin-jun Z (2007), Approaches to predict viscosities of crude oil blends. Journal of Central South University of Technology 14:466-470.
  27. Singh MK, Banerjee T, Khanna A (2005), Genetic algorithm to estimate interaction parameters of multicomponent systems for liquid–liquid equilibria. Computers and Chemical Engineering 29:1712–1719.
  28. Stragevitch L, Davila SG (1997), Application of a generalized maximum likelihood method in the reduction of multicomponent liquid-liquid equilibrium data. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering 14:41–52.
  29. Tan M, Zou Y, Wang X, Guo Y (2014), A novel wireline logs based approach for assessment of mineral concentrations in organic shale. Oil Shale 31(2):132–146.
  30. Vakili-Nezhaad G, Vatani M, Asghari M (2013), Calculation of the binary interaction and non-randomness parameters of NRTL, NRTL1, and NRTL2 models using genetic algorithm for ternary ionic liquid systems. Chemical Engineering Communications 200:1102–1120.
  31. Vakili-Nezhaad G, Vatani M, Gujarathi AM (2014), Application of genetic algorithm to calculation of three-suffix margules parameters in ternary extraction ionic liquid systems. International Journal of Thermodynamics 17:1-6.
  32. Vatani M, Asghari M, Vakili-Nezhaad G (2012a), Application of genetic algorithm to the calculation of parameters for NRTL and two-suffix margules models in ternary extraction ionic liquid systems. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 18:1715–1720.
  33. Vatani M, Asghari M, Vakili-Nezhaad G (2012b), Application of genetic algorithm to parameter estimation in liquid-liquid phase equilibrium modeling. The Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science 5(1):60-66.
  34. Wallace D, Henry D (1987), A correlation for correcting the viscosity of solvent-extracted bitumen to a solvent-free basis. AOSTRA Journal of Research 3:239-249.
  35. Xue Y, Cheng L, Mou J, Zhao W (2014), A new fracture prediction method by combining genetic algorithm with neural network in low-permeability reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 121:159–166.
  36. Yuan W, Hansen AC, Zhang Q, Tan Z (2005), Temperature-dependent kinematic viscosity of selected biodiesel fuels and blends with diesel fuel. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society 82:195-199.