Main Article Content


Most historical buildings and structures in Oman were built using unreinforced stone masonry. Such structures are prone to damage from seismic activity as these structures have negligible resistance to tensile stresses. This paper presents an exploration of the physical and chemical properties of local building materials and the results of experiments with a new strengthening technique using textile reinforced mortar. Limestone and Sarooj  were the main building materials used historically in these buildings. Sarooj  is a local Omani term for artificial pozzolana produced by calcining clays. Two mortar mixes were developed, one as the jointing mortar and the second as the matrix mortar. The second part of the study consisted of the construction of three masonry walls and two columns of 0.35 x 0.25 x 1.2 m (width x depth x height). The three walls were strengthened using externally bonded textiles using three different combinations of mortar and textile. One column specimen was kept as a control and the other was fully wrapped with carbon textile reinforced mortar. The walls were tested under out-of-plane four- point bending. All the wall specimens showed a significant improvement in strength up to three times its self-weight and reasonable deformation before failure. The column specimens were tested under axial compression. The failure load and displacement of the strengthened columns increased by seven and three times, respectively, compared to the control column.



Strengthening Historical Stone masonry wall Textile reinforced mortar Rehabilitation.

Article Details

How to Cite
Al-Saidy, A., Hago, A., El-Gamal, S., & Dawood, M. (2017). Strengthening of Historical Stone Masonry Buildings in Oman using Textile Reinforced Mortars. The Journal of Engineering Research [TJER], 14(1), 23–38.


  1. Al-Mashani, A (1997), Traditional construction in Dhofar. 1st ed, in Arabic.
  2. Al-Rawas A, Hago A, Corcoran T and Al Ghafri K (1998), Properties of Omani artificial pozzolana (Sarooj). Applied Clay Science 13: 275–292.
  3. Al-Rawas A and Hago A (2006), Evaluation of field and laboratory produced burnt clay pozzolans. Applied Clay Science 31: 29– 35.
  4. American Society for testing and materials, ASTM C 114-13, standard test methods for chemical analysis of hydraulic cement.
  5. American Society for testing and materials, ASTM C 25-11, standard test methods for chemical analysis of limestone, quicklime and hydrated lime.
  6. American Society for testing and materials, ASTM C51, 2011. Standard terminology relating to lime and limestone (as used by the Industry).
  7. American Society for testing and materials, ASTM C618 (1980), Specifications for fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolana for use as a mineral admixture in Portland cement. 375–378.
  8. American Society for testing and materials, ASTM D5034–09, 2013, Standard test method for breaking strength and elongation of textile fabrics (Grab Test).
  9. American Society for testing and materials, ASTM D6473, 2010, Standard test method for specific gravity and absorption of rock for erosion control.
  10. American Society for testing and materials, ASTM D7012, 2004, Standard test methods for compressive strength and elastic moduli of intact rock core specimens under varying states of stress and temperatures.
  11. Bernat-Maso E, Escrig C, Aranha C and Gil L (2014), Experimental assessment of textile reinforced sprayed mortar. Construction and Building Materials 50: 226–236.
  12. Ehsani M R, Saadatmanesh H, Al-Saidy A (1997), Shear behavior of URM retrofitted with FRP overlays. Journal of Composites. for Construction 2(1): 17-25.
  13. Hago A, Al-Rawas A (1997), Properties of the Omani Sarooj. Engineering Journal of University of Qatar 10: 81-91.
  14. Hago A, Al-Rawas A, Al-Sidairi A (2002a), Effect of the fineness of artificial pozzolana (Sarooj) on the properties of limepozzolana mixes. Science and Technology 7: 251-258.
  15. Hago A, Al-Rawas A, Al-Riyami A (2002b), Effect of varying cement content and curing conditions on the properties of Sarooj. Building and Environment 37: 45-53.
  16. Harajli M, ElKhatib H, San-Jose J (2010), Static and cyclic out-of-plane response of masonry walls. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 22(11): 1171-1180.
  17. Kolsch H (1998), Carbon fiber cement matrix (CFCM) overlay system for masonry strengthening. Journal of Composites for Construction 2:105-109.
  18. Ministry of Heritage and Culture, Office of Deputy Minister for Ministry Affairs (1994), Forts and Castles in Oman. Sultanate of Oman: Studies Department, in Arabic.
  19. Papanicolaou C, Triantafillou T, Lekka M (2011), Externally bonded grids as strengthening and seismic retrofitting materials for masonry panels. Construction and Building Materials 25: 504–514.
  20. Pinho F, Luco V, Baiao M (2014), Rubble stone masonry walls strengthened by threedimensional steel ties and textile reinforced mortar render under compression. International Journal of architectural Heritage 8(5): 670–689.
  21. Saadatmanesh H, Ehsani M, Li M (1994), Strength and ductility of concrete columns externally reinforced with fiber composite straps. ACI Struct. Journal. 91(4): 434–447.
  22. Shirmohammadi F, Esmaeily A, Kiaeipour Z (2015), Stress–strain model for circular concrete columns confined by FRP and conventional lateral steel. Engineering Structures 84: 395–405.
  23. Triantafillou T (1998), Strengthening of masonry structures using epoxy-bonded FRP laminates. Journal of Composites for Construction 2: 96-104.
  24. Varshney RS (1982), Concrete technology. Oxford: IBH Company.