Main Article Content


The present work deals with the development of thermodynamic model of low temperature basic Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) system and a chevron plate heat exchanger evaporator sub-model using Engineering Equation Solver (EES). Work output is evaluated using the ORC thermodynamic model, while the evaporator sub-model calculates the total surface area of the heat exchanger. Using these mathematical models, the effect of evaporation pressure, expander inlet temperature and pinch point temperature difference (PPTD) on the network output and evaporator cost are studied. In addition to this, the effect of plate spacing and plate width of chevron plate heat exchanger on pressure drop and evaporator cost are analyzed in detail. Finally, thermodynamic and geometric optimization is carried out using genetic algorithm to identify the optimum parameters at which the network output is maximized and pressure drop in the evaporator is minimized. Sensitivity analysis showed that optimum evaporator pressure existed at which network output is maximum. Thermodynamic optimization showed that work output was maximum (5.03 kW) at evaporator pressure of 5.77 bar. No improvement in the work output was seen with increase in PPTD and expander inlet temperature. Increase in plate width and plate spacing led to increase in evaporator cost and decrease in pressure drop.


Evaporator Genetic algorithm Plate heat exchanger Optimization Sensitivity analysis Thermodynamic model.

Article Details

How to Cite
Suhas, U., & Veershetty, G. (2019). PARAMETRIC INVESTIGATION OF ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLE EVAPORATOR FOR LOW TEMPERATURE APPLICATIONS. The Journal of Engineering Research [TJER], 16(2), 130–141.


  1. Arnaud L, Nicolas T, Philippe H, Rémi R, and Stéphane C (2017), Organic Rankine cycle design and performance comparison based on experimental database, Applied Energy, 204: 1172-1187.
  2. Dai Y, Jiangfeng W, Lin G (2009), Parametric optimization and comparative study of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for low grade waste heat recovery, Energy Conversion and Management, 50: 576-582.
  3. Evangelos B, Christos T (2018), Investigation of a hybrid ORC driven by waste heat and solar energy, Energy Conversion and Management,156: 427-439
  4. Filiz T.O. N, Rıdvan S, Atakan T (2015), Thermodynamic analysis of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) based on industrial data, Applied Thermal Engineering, 91: 43-52.
  5. Francesco C, Massimo D d’Accadia, Maria V, Marco S (2015), Design and simulation of a prototype of a small-scale solar CHP system based on evacuated flat-plate solar collectors and Organic Rankine Cycle, Energy Conversion and Management, 90: 347–363.
  6. Han Dong-Hyouck, Lee Kyu-Jung, Kim Yoon-Ho, (2003), Experiments on the characteristics of evaporation of R410A in brazed plate heat exchangers with different geometric configurations, Applied Thermal Engineering, 23: 1209-1225
  7. Hossein N, Arash N, Farshad J.F. (2017), Conventional and advanced exergy analyses of a geothermal driven dual fluid organic Rankine cycle (ORC), Applied Thermal Engineering, 122: 59-70.
  8. Imran M, Byung S.P. Hyouck J.K. Dong H.L, Muhammad U (2014), Thermo-economic optimization of regenerative organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery applications, Energy Conversion and Management, 87: 107–118.
  9. Imran M, Muhammad U, Byung-Sik Park, Hyouck-Ju Kim, Dong-Hyun L (2015), Multi-objective optimization of evaporator of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for low temperature geothermal heat source, Applied Thermal Engineering, 80: 1-9.
  10. Jian S, Yin S, Chun-wei Gu (2015), Thermodynamic analysis and performance optimization of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) waste heat recovery system for marine diesel engines, Energy, 82: 976-985.
  11. Jiangfeng W, Zhequan Y, Man W, Shaolin M, Yiping D (2013), Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of an (organic Rankine cycle) ORC using low grade heat source, Energy, 49: 356-365.
  12. Man W, Jiangfeng W, Yuzhu Z, Pan Z, Yiping D (2013), Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a solar-driven regenerative organic Rankine cycle (ORC) based on flat-plate solar collectors, Applied Thermal Engineering, 50: 816-825.
  13. Onder K (2014), Energy and exergy analysis of an organic Rankine for power generation from waste heat recovery in steel industry, Energy Conversion and Management, 77: 108-117.
  14. Pei G, Li J, Ji J (2010), Analysis of low temperature solar thermal electric generation using regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle, Applied Thermal Engineering, 30: 998-1004.
  15. Riffat (2012), Experimental investigation of a biomass-fired ORC-based micro-CHP for domestic applications, Fuel, 96: 374-382.
  16. Roshaan M, Faraz A, Man-Hoe Kim (2017), Thermodynamic analysis of organic Rankine cycle used for flue gases from biogas combustion, Energy Conversion and Management, 153: 627-640.
  17. Sahar S, Fereshteh A (2015), Energy and exergy assessments of modified OrganicRankine Cycles (ORCs), Energy reports, 1: 1-7.
  18. Seyedali S, Saeed J, Krishna K (2017), Exergy-based optimization of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for waste heat recovery from an internal combustion engine (ICE), Applied Thermal Engineering, 126: 447-457.
  19. Usman M, Muhammad I, Dong H.L, Byung S.P (2015), Design and experimental investigation of a 1 kW organic Rankine cycle system using R245fa as working fluid for low-grade waste heat recovery from steam, Energy Conversion and Management,103:1089-1100.
  20. Wang X.D, Zhao L, Wang J.L. Zhang W.Z, Zhao X.Z, Wu W (2010), Performance evaluation of a low-temperature solar Rankine cycle system utilizing R245fa, Solar Energy, 84: 353-364.
  21. Xinghua L, Yufeng Z, Jiang S (2017), System performance optimization of ORC-based geo-plant with R245fa under different geothermal water inlet temperatures, Geothermics, 66: 134-142.
  22. Yiping D, Jiangfeng W, Lin G (2009), Parametric optimization and comparative study of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for low grade waste heat recovery. Energy Conversion and Management, 50: 576-582.