Main Article Content


For a long time, bitumen has been utilized as the essential material for asphalt pavement construction. The factors of increasing axle loads, increasing traffic movement, critical climate conditions and many forms failures in construction have steered many researchers to seek some methods to enhance the asphalt binder properties. Even though various types of modifiers have been utilized in strengthening asphalt concrete, fibers have attracted the most attention due to their high and desirable characteristics. It is realized that the good distribution of the modifier in asphalt binder can generate a strong network in the interior structure of the blend, causing bitumen mastic to be more coherent. In this study, a laboratory investigation of the rheological and physical properties of various grades of bitumen modified by two types of fibers was conducted. Three grades of asphalt were used in this study (60-70 penetration grade, 80-100 penetration grade and PG-76 grade) with two types of fibers with different percentages- Cellulose oil palm fiber (COPF) (0.15, 0.3, 0.45, 0.6, and 0.75%) by weight of asphalt and carbon fiber (0.75, 1.25, 1.75, 2.25, and 2.75%) by weight of asphalt. The results showed enhancement in physical performance of the modified bitumen in terms of the decrease in penetration values, as well as a rise in the softening point and viscosity values. The fibers’ modified asphalt binders showed improved rheological properties and can raise the grade of asphalt depending on the base asphalt type.


Carbon fiber Cellulose oil palm fiber Asphalt grade Modified bitumen Rheology.

Article Details

How to Cite
Tayh, S. A., Yousif, R. A., & Banyhussan, Q. S. (2020). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PHYSICAL PROPERTIES USING VARIOUS GRADES ASPHALT BINDER WITH DIFFERENT TYPE OF FIBERS. The Journal of Engineering Research [TJER], 17(1), 34–40.


  1. Abiola OS, Kupolati WK, Sadiku ER, and Ndambuki JM (2014), Utilisation of natural fibre as modifier in bituminous mixes: A review. Construction and Building Materials 54: 305-312.
  2. Ahmedzade P (2013), The investigation and comparison effects of SBS and SBS with new reactive terpolymer. Construction and Building Materials 38:285-291.
  3. Airey GD (2004), Fundamental binder and practical mixture evaluation of polymer modified bituminous materials. International Journal of Pavement Engineering 5(3): 137-151.
  4. Al-Otaibi HM, Al-Suhaibani AS, and Alsoliman HA (2016), Physical and Rheological Properties of Asphalt Modified with Cellulose Date Palm Fibers. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering 10(5): 583-587.
  5. Bonica C, Toraldo E, Andena L, Marano C, and Mariani E (2016), The effects of fibers on the performance of bituminous mastics for road pavements. Composites Part B: Engineering 95: 76-81.
  6. Cleven M.A. (2000), “Investigation of the properties of Carbon Fiber Modified Asphalt Mixtures,” Master thesis, Michigan Technological University, Mishigan.
  7. Doan TTL, Gao SL, and Mäder E (2006), Jute/polypropylene composites I. Effect of matrix modification. Composites Science and Technology 66(7-8): 952-963.
  8. Hassan HF, and Al-Jabri KS (2005), Effect of organic fibers on open-graded friction course mixture properties. International Journal of Pavement Engineering 6(1): 67-75.
  9. Kumar P, Sikdar PK, Bose S, and Chandra S (2004), Use of jute fibre in stone matrix asphalt. Road materials and pavement design 5(2): 239-249.
  10. Ling PA, Peng WA, Bo LI, Pan PA, and Shaopeng WU (2014), Investigation of Rheological Characteristics of Carbon fiber Modified Asphalt Binder. Key Engineering Materials 599.
  11. Maniruzzaman AM, Hamad AW, Maleka AM, and Elsergany M (2015a), Rheological Properties of Cellulose Oil Palm Fiber (COPF) Modified 80-100 Asphalt Binder. Journal of Advanced Research in Materials Science 5(1): 10-20.
  12. Maniruzzaman AM, Hamad AW, Maleka AM, Jakarni FM, and Bahru UJ (2015b), Effect of Viscoelastic Behavior of Cellulose Oil Palm Fiber (COPF) Modified 60-70 Asphalt Binder for Deterioration for Roads and Highways. Jurnal Teknologi 75(11): 17-23.
  13. Muniandy R, and Huat BB (2006), Laboratory diameteral fatigue performance of stone matrix asphalt with cellulose oil palm fiber. American Journal of Applied Sciences 3(9): 2005-2010.
  14. Muniandy R, Jafariahangari H, Yunus R, and Hassim S (2008), Determination of rheological properties of bio mastic asphalt. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 1(3): 204-209.
  15. Nejad FM, Vadood M, and Baeetabar S (2014), Investigating the mechanical properties of carbon fibre-reinforced asphalt concrete. Road Materials and Pavement Design 15(2): 465-475.
  16. Rout J, Misra M, Tripathy SS, Nayak SK, and Mohanty AK (2001), The influence of fibre treatment on the performance of coir-polyester composites. Composites Science and Technology 61(9): 1303-1310.
  17. Sharma V, and Goyal S (2006), Comparative study of performance of natural fibres and crumb rubber modified stone matrix asphalt mixtures. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 33(2): 134-139.
  18. Wu MM, Li R, Zhang YZ, Fan L, Lv YC, and Wei JM (2015), Stabilizing and reinforcing effects of different fibers on asphalt mortar performance. Petroleum Science 12(1): 189-196.
  19. Yang J, Shi X, Wan J, Qian G, Pan W, and Yang Y (2006), Evaluation of rutting resistance of double-layered asphalt mixes. Road Materials and Pavement Design 7: 533–542.
  20. Yi-qiu T, Li X, and Zhou X (2010), Interactions of granite and asphalt based on the rheological characteristics. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 22(8): 820-825.