Main Article Content


The current study presents three-dimensional modeling and analysis of blood flow through artery stenosis under several variants of pulsatile flow to mimic the atherosclerosis artery disease. The study considered Newtonian and non-Newtonian blood flow models and solved the three-dimensional laminar and unsteady Navier-Stokes (NS) equations for different inlet velocity profiles. The Carreau Yasuda model was used for hemodynamics modeling of fluid viscosity. A comparative analysis was carried out for Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluid models under several simple pulsatile, equivalent pulsatile and physiological velocity profiles. The non-Newtonian fluid exhibited a higher centerline velocity. Wall shear stresses, shear strain rates, velocity fields, and vortex distribution for Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluid flows show significant differences. A higher wall shear was noticed near the stenosis. The vortex formed near the stenosis shifts to upstream and downstream of the stenosis with the change of velocity pulse. The velocity profile deflates more for non-Newtonian flows than the Newtonian flows.


Non-newtonian fluid Blood flows Artery stenosis Physiological flows Pulsatile flows.

Article Details

How to Cite
Samad, A., Husain, A., Zunaid, M., & Samad, A. (2017). Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Pulsatile Flows through an Artery with Stenosis. The Journal of Engineering Research [TJER], 14(2), 191–205.


  1. Ahsaas S, Tiwari S (2016), Numerical Simulation of Blood Flow through Asymmetric and Symmetric Occlusion in Carotid Artery. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer (FFHMT’16). Ottawa, Canada 170–8.
  2. Ang C, Mazumdar JN (1997), Mathematical Flow through Modelling of Three-Dimensional an Asymmetric Arterial Stenosis. Mathl. Comput. Modelling 25: 19-29.
  3. Ansys CFX (2010), Release 11.0: Ansys CFX-Solver Theory Guide. ANSYS.
  4. Bharadvaj BK, Mabon RF, Giddens DP (1982a), Steady flow in a model of the human carotid bifurcation. Part I-Flow visualization. Journal of Biomechanics 15:349–362. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(82)90057-4.
  5. Bharadvaj BK, Mabon RF, Giddens DP (1982b), Steady flow in a model of the human carotid bifurcation. Part II-Laser-Doppler anemometer measurements. Journal of Biomechanics 15:363–378. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(82)90058-6.
  6. Chakravarty S, Mandal PK (1994), Mathematical modelling of blood flow through an overlapping arterial stenosis. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 19:59–70. doi: 10.1016/0895-7177(94)90116-3.
  7. Chiastra C, Gallo D, Tasso P, Iannaccone F, Migliavacca F, Wentzel JJ, Morbiducci U (2017), Healthy and diseased coronary bifurcation geometries influence near-wall and intravascular flow: A computational exploration of the hemodynamic risk. Journal of Biomechanics 58:79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.04.016.
  8. Deplano V, Siouffi M (1999), Experimental and numerical study of pulsatile flows through stenosis: Wall shear stress analysis. Journal of Biomechanics 32:1081–1090. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00098-6.
  9. Deshpande MD, Giddens DP, Mabon RF (1976), Steady laminar flow through modelled vascular stenoses. Journal of Biomechanics 9:165–174. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(76)90001-4.
  10. Ellahi R, Rahman SU, Nadeem S (2014), Blood flow of Jeffrey fluid in a catherized tapered artery with the suspension of nanoparticles. Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics 378:2973–2980. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2014.08.002.
  11. Gijsen FJH, van de Vosse FN, Janssen JD (1999), The influence of the non-Newtonian properties of blood on the flow in large arteries: steady flow in a carotid bifurcation model. J Biomech 32: 601–608.
  12. Hye MA, Paul MC (2015), A computational study on spiral blood flow in stenosed arteries with and without an upstream curved section. Applied Mathematical Modelling 39:4746–4766. doi: 10.1016/ j.apm.2015.04.019.
  13. Jozwik K, Obidowski D (2008), Geometrical models of vertebral arteries and numerical simulations of the blood flow through them. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Frontiers in Biomedical Devices Conference and Exhibition. June 18-20, Irvine, California, USA. 75–79.
  14. Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK, Glagov S (1985), Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 5:293–302. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.5.3.293.
  15. Liao W, Lee TS, Low HT (2004), Numerical studies of physiological pulsatile flow through constricted tube. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat and Fluid Flow 14:689–713. doi: 10.1108/09615530410539991.
  16. Long Q, Xu XY, Ramnarine K V., Hoskins P (2001), Numerical investigation of physiologically realistic pulsatile flow through arterial stenosis. Journal of Biomechanics 34:1229–1242. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00100-2.
  17. MazHer AHK, Ekaterinaris JA (1988), Numerical simulation of blood flow through arteries. In: Proceedings of the 1988 Fourteenth Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference. 10-11 March; Durham, NH, USA, USA, 273–276.
  18. Mcdonald DA (1955), The Relation of Pulsatile Pressure To Flow in Arteries. J Physiol I27:533–552. doi: 10.1113 / jphysiol. 1955. sp005275.
  19. Mekheimer KS, El Kot MA (2015), Suspension model for blood flow through catheterized curved artery with time-variant overlapping stenosis. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal 18:452–462. doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2015.03.010.
  20. Nadeem S, Akbar NS, Hendi AA, Hayat T (2011), Power law fluid model for blood flow through a tapered artery with a stenosis. Applied Mathematics and Computation 217:7108–7116. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.01.026.
  21. Perktold K, Rappitsch G (1995), Computer-Simulation of Local Blood-Flow and Vessel Mechanics in a Compliant Carotid-Artery Bifurcation Model. Journal of Biomechanics 28:845–856. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(95) 95273-8.
  22. Perktold K, Resch M, Peter RO (1991), Three-dimensional numerical analysis of pulsatile flow and wall shear stress in the carotid artery bifurcation. Journal of Biomechanics 24:409–420. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90029-M.
  23. Razavi A, Shirani E, Sadeghi MR (2011), Numerical simulation of blood pulsatile flow in a stenosed carotid artery using different rheological models. Journal of Biomechanics 44:2021–2030. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.023.
  24. Srivastava VP, Rastogi R (2010), Blood flow through a stenosed catheterized artery: Effects of hematocrit and stenosis shape. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 59:1377–1385. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.12.007.
  25. Tu C, Deville M (1996), Pulsatile flow of Non-Newtonian fluids through arterial stenoses. Journal of Biomechanics 29:899–908. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00151-4.
  26. Tu C, Deville M, Dheur L, Vanderschuren L (1992), Finite element simulation of pulsatile flow through arterial stenosis. Journal of Biomechanics 25:1141–1152. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90070-H.
  27. Van Doormaal JP, Raithby GD (1984), Enhancements of the simple method for predicting incompressible fluid flows. Numerical Heat Transfer 7:147–163. doi: 10.1080/01495728408961817.
  28. Young DF, Tsai FY (1973), Flow characteristics in models of arterial stenosis - I. Steady flow. Journal of biomechanics 6:395–410. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(73)90099-7.
  29. Zendehbudi GR, Moayeri MS (1999), Comparison of physiological and simple pulsatile flows through stenosed arteries. Journal of Biomechanics 32:959–965. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00053-6.