Article Sidebar

Submitted
Oct 22, 2019
Published
Oct 22, 2019
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1711 Download : 522

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this action research project was to discover what interventions would be most effective in decreasing the off-task behaviors of a student. Interventions used were use of a token system, changes in classroom environment and teacher attention. The sample selected for this research was a student in a second-grade classroom. This action research grew out of the frustration and sense of inadequacy of a teacher attempting to deal with the off-task behaviors of one of her students. The student’s off task behaviors were interfering with her learning and that of her classmates. There were seven specific off-task behaviors that helped define the problem. These behaviors included daydreaming, speaking to peers, talking out of turn, touching others, fidgeting with objects, getting out of her seat at inappropriate times, and putting her head down on the table. The three tools that were chosen to document evidence of the problem were an observation checklist, a student survey and a teacher survey. The findings indicated that allowing the subject to enjoy one of her favorite activities, contingent upon a decrease in the off-task behaviors, was effective in maintaining the desired behavior of staying on-task and decreasing inappropriate behaviors.

Keywords

Task behaviors intervention token system classroom environment action research.

Article Details

References

  1. Atwood, V., & Leitner, J. (2001). Time and space: Tools for effective teaching. Education, 106(1), 15-21.
  2. Babkie, A. (2006). Be proactive in man-aging classroom behavior. Interven-tion in School and Clinic, 41(3), 184-187.
  3. Barbetta, P. M., Norona, K. L., & Bicard, D. F. (2005). Classroom behavior management: A dozen common mistakes and what to do instead. Preventing School Failure, 49(3), 11-19.
  4. Burns, M.. & Dean, V. (2005). Effect of acquisition rates on off-task behav-ior with children identified as hav-ing learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(4), 273-281.
  5. Carns, A. W., & Carns, M. R. (1994). Making behavioral contracts suc-cessful. School Counselor, 42(2), 155-160.
  6. Church, E. B. (2006) A love of learning: How to inspire curiosity, creative thinking, and joy along your child’s path to greater knowledge. Parent & Child, Retrieved March 14, 2009, from http://content.scholastic.com
  7. DeVries, R., & Zan, B. (2003). When children make rules. Educational Leadership, 61(1), 64-67.
  8. Erwin, J. C. (2003). Giving students what they need. Educational Leadership, 61(1), 19-23.
  9. Gunter, P. L., Coutinho, M. J., & Cade, T. (2002). Classroom factors linked with academic gains among stu-dents with emotional and behavioral problems. Preventing School Failure, 46, 126-132.
  10. Higgins, J. W., Williams, R. L., & McLaughlin T. F. (2001). The effects of a token economy employing in-structional consequences for a third-grade student with learning disabilities: A data-based case study. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 99-106.
  11. Huitt, W. (1999). Classroom manage-ment: First week activities. Educa-tional Psychology Interactive, Re-trieved May 2, 2009 from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/edpsyc/firstwk.htmlJones, F. (2005). Dealing with bad behavior. Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers, 80(7), 7.
  12. Marzano, R. J., & Marzano, J. S. (2003). The key to classroom management. Educational Leadership, 61(1), 6-13.
  13. McGinnis, J. C., Friman, P. C., Carylon, W. D. (2001). The effect of token re-wards on "intrinsic" motivation for doing math. Journal of Applied Behav-ior Analysis,3, 375-379.
  14. Moore, D., Anderson, A., & Kumar, K. (2005). Instructional adaptation in the management of escape-maintained behavior in a classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interven-tions, 7(4), 216-223.
  15. Morgan-Fleming, B., Burley, H., & Price, M. (2003). The benefits of being off-task. International Journal of Social Education, 18(1), 1-8.
  16. Musser, E. H., Bray, M. A., Kehle, T. J., & Jenson, W. J. (2001). Reducing disruptive behaviors in students with serious emotional disturbance. The School Psychology Review, 30, 294-304.
  17. Pacchiano, D. M., (2000). A review of instructional variables related to student problem behavior. Prevent-ing School Failure no4, 174-178.
  18. Randolph, J. (2007). Meta-analysis of the research on response cards: Effects on test achievement, participation, and off-task behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(2), 113-128.
  19. Repp, A. (1999). Naturalistic functional assessment with regular and special education students in classroom settings. Functional Analysis of Problem Behavior, 240.
  20. Rogers, B. (2006, May). Five tricky per-sonalities and how to handle them. Instructor Magazine, Retrieved April 8, 2009, from:
  21. http://content.scholastic.com/browse/ arcticlejsp ?
  22. Bru, E. (2006). Factors associated with disruptive behaviour in the class-room. Scandinavian Journal of Educa-tional Research, 50(1), 23-43.
  23. Wright, J. (n.d.) School-wide strategies for managing... off- task/ inatten-tion. Intervention Central, Retrieved April, 2009, from:
  24. http://www.jimwrightonline.com/php/interventionistaintv_list.php?prob
  25. Wuest, D. (1999). Are you with it? PE Central, Retrieved March 14, 2009, from: http://www.pecentral.org/climate/april99article.html
  26. Yarbrough, J., & Thompson, C. (2002). Using single-participant research to assess counseling approaches on children’s off-task behavior. Profes-sional School Counseling, 5(5), 308-314.